Table of contentsFactors Affecting The Reproductive Success of Hatchery- & Wild Male Spring Chinook Cle Elum Observation Stream Experimental Approaches To Evaluating RS Allotting Space For The Populations Sections Of The Observation Stream Used In 01 & 02 Area In Observation Stream Used In 2003, 04, & 05 Area Allotted Per Female 2001, 2002, & 2003 Populations Factors Affecting Male Reproductive Success Null Hypothesis Tested: Males Types Of Males Used No Of Fry Used In Pedigree Evaluations Variation In RS By Sex RS Of Hatchery Males & Hatchery Jacks Relative To Wild Males RS Of Hatchery Jacks & Wild Jacks Relative To Wild Males & Each Other RS Of Hatchery & Wild Precocious Males Relative To Wild Males and Each Other Factors Affecting Female RS Slide 17 Egg Deposition “High Density Populations” Egg Deposition “Low Density Population” Egg-To-Fry Survival “High Density Populations” Egg-To-Fry Survival “Low Density Population” Factors Examined That Could Potentially Affect Female RS: 2001 Lower Pop Female Body Wt. Vs. No. Of Fry In Pedigree Sample Adjusting For Differences In Fecundity & Egg Deposition Female Body Wt. Vs. No Of Adj Fry In Pedigree Sample The Effect of Longevity On Female RS 2001 Lower Population The Effect Of Redd Tenure 2001 Lower Population The Affect Of Instantaneous Density On Territory Size The Affect Of Redd Size On Female RS 2001 Lower Population: PED to Adj Fry No. Calculation Of Nearest Neighbor Distances Affect Of Instant. Density On Fry No.s/Female (2001 Low Population:Nearest Neighbors) Date Of Redd Establishment & Female RS 2001 Lower Population Influence Of Territory Possession On Agonistic Behavior In Females Relationship Between Agonistic Behavior & Egg-To-Fry Survival: 2001 Lower Population Fry Production By Territorial & Wandering Females: 2003 Fry In Pedigree Samples Originating From Terr. & Wandering Females Longevity Of Territorial & Wandering Females Conclusions: Females Conclusions: Males |