Fish Biologist
What is SOAC?
- System: Yakima Project Reservoirs and Diversions
- Operations: How, where, and when
- Advisory: Provide recommendations
- Committee: WA DFW, USFWS, Yakama Nation, Irrigation Districts
- Formed in early 1980’s following Quackenbush Ruling
Annual SOAC Considerations
- Flip-Flop, Spawning and Incubation Flows
- Tieton and Bumping Drawdown
- Timing of maintenance activities
- Smolt migration flows
Slide 4
SOAC shall recommend a passage release based on the following criteria:
- At least 100 smolts (all species combined) were counted (Chandler JV raw count) passing Prosser Dam on three consecutive days (indicating smolt outmigration has begun); and
Temperature Criteria
- Mean Water Temperature
- (3-day moving average, F.)
- Monitoring Interval
- 55 -- 60F 14 days
- 60 – 65F 10 days
- > 65F 7 days
Significant Fish Passage Event
- Significant Fish Passage Event = Composite Smolt Passage > (CSP + CSP + CSP ) x 2
- N N-3 N-2 N-1
- 3
- A Significant Fish Passage Event (SFPE) is said to have occurred if the Composite Smolt Passage (CSP) on Day N is greater than twice the moving average CSP for the previous three days. CSP is the sum of daily estimated passage past Prosser Dam for all wild and hatchery smolts by species.
Slide 8
- A significant fish passage event, measured at the Chandler Juvenile Fish Evaluation Facility, has not occurred during the previous ______ day (see temperature ranges above) monitoring interval (indicating that smolt migration in the lower Yakima River has stalled); and
- During the previous _____ day monitoring interval, there has been a continuous decline in mean daily flow measured at Parker (PARW), when the _____ day mean flow is between 2,000 and 600 cfs; or
-
Slide 9
Slide 10
What is a Pulse Flow?
- Increase the flow at the Parker gage (PARW) by 1,000 cfs as rapidly as possible;
- Maintain pulse at PARW for 48 hours;
- Decrease the discharge and return to the applicable Title XII target flow at PARW, following established ramping rates when reducing releases from storage.
SOAC Recommendation
- Criteria were met on June 6, 2005
- SOAC recommended pulse flow
- Discussed at River Operations Meeting
- Result:
Slide 13
Why Did 2005 Pulse Flow Fail to Stimulate Smolt Migration
- Yearling species were gone, fall chinook have different behavior
- Pulse was not of sufficient duration or magnitude
- Artificially created “freshet” with reservoir water doesn’t have all migration cues (example from Teanaway)
- ???
Slide 15
What were the costs to irrigation districts?
- No effect on senior water rights
- Junior districts prorationing at 39%
- Pulse flow may have used 5000-6000 acre-feet of storage
- For comparison, water purchases were $115-125/AF—pulse flow >$600,000
- About 1% of prorated water supply
- Effects unknown until end of June weather report
Future of Pulse Flows?
- Re-evaluate criteria
- Improve understanding of fall chinook migration
- Use YRBWEP saved water rather than storage water?