‹header›
‹date/time›
Click to edit Master text styles
Second level
Third level
Fourth level
Fifth level
‹footer›
‹#›
I will be speaking today from two perspectives:
-My professional background is in hydrology, geomorphology, and fisheries habitat.  As part of my job, I design and construct LWD jams in streams and rivers -Running rivers is one of my free-time passions.  I hunt and fish on class II and III rivers and spend another 20 - 30 days a year running class IV and V whitewater throughout the Pacific Northwest and California. 
Greater-than or equal-to 2.0m (6.6’) and greater-than or equal-to 10cm (4”) diameter
When secondary forming factors are included in the analysis, LWD assists the formation and maintenance of 40% of all pools surveyed. 
Pools formed in association with LWD are frequently deeper with slower velocities
LWD retains and sorts spawning gravels
LWD provides habitat and nutrients for macroinvertebrates and microorganisms
Pools with LWD can support more fish than pools without due, primarily, to increased cover
Pools with LWD are often support a greater number of species
All sites with “N” prefix are LWD accumulations of natural origin
All sites with a “K” prefix were constructed in late-July and early-August 2004
Site “N4”, the only channel-spanning jam, accounted for 60%  of the adult Chinook observed
Surveyed reach (from K1 to N4) is 1650’ long
Underwater video of adult spring Chinook salmon holding in a LWD cluster several days after it was constructed (Klickitat River Meadows Project, Site K1, Yakama Nation Fisheries Program
Underwater video of a different adult spring Chinook salmon holding in a LWD cluster several days after it was constructed (Klickitat River Meadows Project, Site K1, Yakama Nation Fisheries Program)
Underwater video of 3 adult spring Chinook salmon holding in a LWD cluster of natural origin
(within Klickitat River Meadows Project, Site N1, Yakama Nation Fisheries Program)
Photo is of a channel-spanning log on the EF Hood River.  This type of position increases risk to boaters. However, there was a sizeable pool upstream pool and plenty of space to portage on the right bank which 9 of 10 boaters did without much trouble. On this particular trip, one of the less-experienced members missed the eddy upstream and ended up flipping on the log and washed underneath.
He and his boat were recovered unharmed.
Boaters need to be constantly aware of their environment.
Everyone should boat “Heads-up” – be conscious of what’s downstream, boat spacing, and available eddy space
Note river-wide log at top of photo and boats being portaged
Though this piece prevents running the rapid top-to-bottom, it is more of a nuisance than a hazard (there is a good pool above it and ample opportunity to scout) The habitat value of its present position is negligible, but the potential for this piece to serve a downstream ecological function is largely dependent on remaining intact
Nearly channel spanning contributes to greater hazard with a high flip potential at pictured flows This particular log can be passed on river-right, but the boater wasn’t paying close enough attention as they approached This is an ephemeral/temporary resting location and the log will wash out of pictured position
Here LWD combined with boulders create a convenient eddy in an otherwise busy/continuous reach
These areas are useful to boaters for resting, rescue, and recovery
Overall this run is fairly devoid of in-channel LWD
Much of it has to do with recruitment potential…where standing trees of sufficient size exist (not uncommon), they generally fall from such a height/distance that the trees break and the resulting pieces are easily transported (i.e. less likely to hang-up in the main channel) In this case, LWD has been strained-out by riparian trees at the downstream end of a bar and high-flow channel
The diagonal log interferes with approach to the meat of the drop, but not a deal-breaker
Looks worse than it is though, and was easily passed to the right.
Note person (inside oval) for scale
Undercuts tend to pose more of a hazard on most California rivers than LWD, however, there is always the potential for strainers In this case, a substantial log has been pinned in an undercut sufficiently long (at least 10 years according to my source) for the rapid to be named after it
A friend of mine front-surfing one of the most dependable surf-waves on the Stabler to High Bridge section (“the Upper”) of the Wind River The hydraulic is created by the interaction of the log and boulders in the bed of the river
Result of an intense summer thunderstorm on a burned tributary watershed (Lake Creek) of the Middle Fork Salmon River (ID) in 2006.  The resulting debris flow generated a debris fan that temporarily dammed the MF. A LWD jam formed downstream at Pistol Creek rapid. The fan and channel braiding immediately downstream continue pose a navigation challenge to boaters Photos were taken prior to blasting by the Forest Service to clear the jam from the rapid in July 2006 The MF Salmon River is designated “Wild and Scenic” and occurs with the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Area
The individual who made the post has made numerous anti-wood-in-streams posts over the past couple of years. Ironically, the poster zealously defended environmental extremist Dave Foreman (co-founder of “Earth First”) in a different thread
Sadly, he is apparently unaware of his own hypocrisy
My job generally involves putting LWD into streams, so I am no expert on removal.
Since half (3 out of 6) of the questions I received in advance involved removal of wood, I contacted some colleagues at various jurisdictional agencies.
The following content is based largely on their responses.
Characterizing something as a safety risk make us feel better about removing it
even if removal may not be the appropriate prescription
often a way to cover-up laziness (i.e. not wanting to portage)
Rivers are not inter-state highways
This channel-spanning log on the Wind River (~1/2 mi downstream of Stabler) was easy to float over at moderate flows and a straightforward drag/portage on river-left at lower flows There are several class IV+ rapids downstream that would be far worse places to have to deal with these logs.
Wind River (Washington) - February 2006
Surf wave created by LWD